Justice US Department of Defense believes that Apple and Samsung should once again face each other in what seemed an endless patent litigation in court . Department of Justice, US Department of Energy has been submitted to the court a brief request for the Supreme Court overturned a previous ruling of favor Apple over Samsung , requires the two companies to return once again face a hearing which will determine whether the part the need for additional and ongoing litigation.
Apple and Samsung find themselves top two position globally manufactures luxury smartphone. Of course, the design and manufacture of Apple iOS powered iPhone, Samsung produced a series based on the open source platform Andr oid very popular device.
rather than simply obtaining construction and marketing of new equipment, giant companies have been arguing about the alleged patent infringement in an almost continuous fighting since 2011 in . Samsung was originally ordered to pay Apple $ 930 million in compensation, it has been trying to attract and reduction.
Although the initial discovery of the iPhone, Samsung’s patent, which led to the violation of $ 930 million prize, the South Korean company to see a small amount of light at the end of the tunnel when the figure in May last year reduced to $ 548 million. The amount of money paid to Apple may be reduced, but the Court of Appeal but still insisted that Samsung infringed patents owned by Apple, including the ruling and the baffle and the circular icon in the Apple device found.
as part of their company’s court brief, Justice US Department of Defense has said “It is unclear whether Samsung Electronics has produced sufficient evidence to support its argument, mobile phone parts, rather than entire phone, when calculating compensation should be the most important. “ it is now asking the Supreme Court to remand the case to the trial court the need for a new trial to determine
Apple and Samsung is currently focused on the landscape Samsung believes Apple’s damage award is excessive because they have been based in part on the specific concerns only a specific component in the device, rather than the fact that the device as a whole violated granted .
(Source: Reuters )
You can follow our microblogging , add us to your circle Google+’s or, as our Facebook page , in order to maintain their updates from Microsoft, Google, Apple and the Web’s latest products.
Related stories
Like this post in Facebook
DOJ Intervenes In Apple Vs Samsung Patent Case
No comments:
Post a Comment